A1. For purposes of this standard, the terms listed below are defined as follows -. A2. A control objective provides a specific target against which to evaluate the. Re: PCAOB Release: Preliminary Staff Views – An Audit of Internal We fully support the PCAOB’s commitment to providing guidance on. General Auditing Standards. Reorg. Pre-Reorg. Reorganized Title. General Principles and Responsibilities. AS AU sec.

Author: Kigaktilar Gajar
Country: Belarus
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 25 June 2007
Pages: 29
PDF File Size: 9.61 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.57 Mb
ISBN: 113-5-24750-852-2
Downloads: 78833
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mazuhn

When a significant period of time has elapsed between the time period covered by the tests of controls in the service auditor’s report and the date specified in management’s assessment, additional procedures should be performed. After a period of time, the length of which depends upon the circumstances, the baseline of the operation of an automated application control should be reestablished.

Flexibility in Using Work of Others and Walkthroughs: Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. AU Section – Segment Information.

Factors that affect the risk associated with a control in subsequent years’ audits include those in paragraph 47 and the following. AU Section – Special Reports. AU Section – Management Representations. Benchmarking is described further beginning at paragraph B AU Section – Special Topics. The auditor might determine the likely sources of potential misstatements by asking himself or herself “what could go wrong?

The auditor should inquire of management to determine whether management has identified any changes in the service organization’s controls subsequent to the period covered by the service auditor’s report such as changes communicated to management from the service organization, changes in personnel at the service organization with whom management interacts, changes in reports or other data received from the service organization, changes in contracts or service level agreements with the service organization, or errors identified in the service organization’s processing.


Click to expand menu items Click to collapse menu items.

Leveraging Auditing Standard No.5 to Streamline SOX Compliance

The full texts of detailed pfaob concerning these actions will be cpaob to the SEC Web site as soon as possible. Scaling is most effective as a natural extension of the risk-based approach and applicable to the audits of all companies. In addition, the risk that a company’s internal control over financial reporting will fail to prevent pcabo detect misstatement caused by fraud usually is higher than the risk of failure to prevent or detect error. Controls over management override are important to effective internal control over financial reporting for all companies, and may be particularly important at smaller companies because of the increased involvement of senior management in performing controls and in the period-end financial reporting process.

AU Section – Evidential Matter: In pccaob and responding to risk, the auditor should test controls over specific risks that present a reasonable possibility of material misstatement to the company’s consolidated financial statements.

In addition, the auditor should vary the nature, timing, and extent of testing of controls from year to year to introduce unpredictability into the testing and respond to changes in circumstances. As a result, it will eliminate auditors requiring companies to do work that isn’t necessary.

When disclaiming an opinion because of a scope limitation, the auditor should state that ass5 scope of the audit was not sufficient to warrant the expression of an opinion and, in a separate paragraph or paragraphs, the substantive reasons for the disclaimer.

Entirely automated application controls are generally not subject to breakdowns due to human failure. In determining whether ax5 service auditor’s report provides sufficient evidence to support the auditor’s opinion, the auditor should make inquiries concerning the service auditor’s reputation, competence, and independence.


Consideration of Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit. In an integrated audit of internal control over financial reporting and the financial statements, the auditor also may use this work to obtain evidence supporting the auditor’s assessment of control risk for purposes of the audit of the financial statements. The PCAOB has seen how the accounting firms have run up huge fees, and forced clients to spend millions of dollars on redundant IT systems and unnecessary controls.

A disclaimer of opinion states that the auditor does ws5 express an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The objective of the tests of controls the auditor performs for this purpose is to assess control risk.

To obtain evidence about whether a selected control is effective, the control must be tested directly; the as of a control cannot be inferred from the absence of misstatements detected by substantive procedures.

AU Section pcsob Special Reports: To express an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor ordinarily performs tests of controls and substantive procedures. The additional evidence that is necessary to update the results of testing from an interim date to the company’s year-end depends on the following factors.

Auditing Standard No. 5

The failure to obtain written representations from management, including management’s refusal to furnish them, constitutes a limitation on the scope of the audit. It emphasizes that the auditor is not required to scope the audit to find deficiencies that don’t constitute material weaknesses.

However, the auditor is not required to obtain sufficient ad5 for each quarter individually. These factors are .